Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Regulation and red tape are hampering B.C. resource development

To encourage natural resource development and the prosperity that comes with it, mining investors need more certainty about exploration activities – not less. It’s an issue that deserves immediate attention in B.C.
elmiraaliakbariandashleystedmannew

To encourage natural resource development and the prosperity that comes with it, mining investors need more certainty about exploration activities – not less. It’s an issue that deserves immediate attention in B.C.

According to a recent Fraser Institute survey of senior mining executives, British Columbia’s regulatory and mining permitting processes are onerous compared with those of competing Canadian provinces. This should be top of mind for the government of Premier John Horgan as it evaluates sweeping reforms to natural resource regulation.

A recent provincial government-commissioned report reviewed B.C.’s existing “professional reliance model” – a system that charges industry to police itself. The report calls for greater oversight of B.C.’s resource sectors by creating a new provincial regulator.

The intended purpose of the province’s review is laudable: to ensure transparency and good governance for the natural resource sector. However, the report has far-reaching implications for the mining industry, and the recommendations, if implemented, will likely exacerbate investor uncertainty.

Moreover, a new provincial regulator may damage the province’s competitiveness. According to our survey, the ability to attract exploration activity and investment is already an area of concern for B.C.’s mining industry when compared with Quebec and Ontario.

B.C.’s poor performance in the eyes of mining investors extends beyond regulation and into the permitting process. On a key measure – granting permits in a timely manner – B.C. again lags behind Quebec and Ontario. In fact, Ontario (42%) and Quebec (40%) had much higher percentages of respondents indicating they expected to acquire necessary exploration permits in two months or less compared with only 18% in B.C.

In Quebec, 90% of respondents were confident they would ultimately receive the necessary permits for exploration activity. In Ontario, 88% were “confident” or “highly confident” compared with only 73% in B.C.

When asked about transparency in the permitting process, 48% of respondents in B.C. cited a lack of transparency as a deterrent to investment, placing B.C. behind Quebec, but ahead of Ontario, on this measure.

Clearly, B.C. is falling behind in timeliness and investor confidence in the exploration permitting process in Canada. That’s bad news for British Columbians. A well-developed mining sector can produce considerable economic and community benefits. And to make discoveries, mining companies require timely and clear permitting processes to explore and develop mines.

But if explorers or miners are uncertain about whether they’ll receive necessary permits, or if they’re unsure about how regulations will affect their activities, they’ll be less likely to invest, which means fewer jobs and less revenue flowing through B.C.

Capital will flow to jurisdictions with attractive policies, and B.C. already lags behind Quebec and Ontario on many measures that encourage mining exploration.

The government should take steps to streamline regulatory and permitting processes, rather than add uncertainty, as a new provincial regulator would surely do, so the province can capitalize on its considerable mineral potential. •

Ashley Stedman is a senior policy analyst and Elmira Aliakbari is the associate director of natural resource studies at the Fraser Institute.