Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Who’s Suing Whom: May 30, 2023

The latest from the B.C. Supreme Court
lawcourts-2020-web-cc
The B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver | Chung Chow, BIV

These corporate claims were filed with the B.C. Supreme Court registry in Vancouver.

Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have not been tested or proven in court. 

Defendants

Hainaxin Holdings Ltd. and Yong Yu Zhang

Plaintiff

Xiaodong Ma

Claim

$203,866.67 for breach of agreement and civil fraud to repay a promissory note the defendants obtained from the plaintiff through falsified documentation of the defendants’ bank allegedly withholding their funds.

Defendant

Klondike Contracting Corporation

Plaintiff

Coupal Dastouri

Claim

Damages for breach of contract and wrongful dismissal as the defendant’s financial controller for allegedly delegating a confidential task to another person and misleading the company about how much training the plaintiff had provided to another employee.

Defendant

AMJ Campbell International Vancouver

Plaintiff

8790057 Holdings Ltd.

Claim

An order for the defendant to release vehicles transported from South Africa to Vancouver to the plaintiff after the defendant declined to do so and an order to remove a warehouse lien on the vehicles, as warehousing costs are a result of the defendant refusing to release the vehicles.

Defendants

1241142 B.C. Ltd. and Kim Soo Louie and Yi Si Lei also known as Kevin Lei and Kenny Louie

Plaintiffs

Hamilton-Plus Building Supply Ltd. and Tejpal Kailay and Parminder Kailay

Claim

An order that the defendants adhere to a contract for the plaintiffs to buy a Shaughnessy-area property in Vancouver after the defendants began seeking to sell the property to another party.

Defendant

Nexoptic Technology Corp.

Plaintiffs

0748004 B.C. Ltd. and William Richard Cawker

Claim

$94,500 in damages to cover one year’s compensation for wrongful dismissal in the plaintiffs’ role as vice-president of investor relations and damages for cancelling the plaintiffs’ stock options.